Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Dakane Mohamed Mughow v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT GARISSA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 79 OF 2019 DAKANE MOHAMED MUGHOW.......................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC............................................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant was convicted and sentenced to death on offence of attempted robbery contrary to section 297(2) of the Penal Code in Criminal Case No. 251 of 2012 at Hola. 2. He appealed in High Court Criminal Appeal No. 54 of 2013 at Garissa. The same appeal was heard and dismissed. He did not appeal any further. 3. The trial court on 14/4/2013 after hearing mitigations said court had no discretion as the only penalty for the offence charged was death. 4. Under Muruatetu case and subsequent superior courts decisions have held that mandatory nature or aspect of a death sentence is unconstitutional. 5. Thus the applicant has invoked the above principle of law and thus seeks resentencing. The prosecution does not oppose the application. Thus the court makes the following orders: i. The death sentence in Criminal Case No. 251 of 2012 in Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court at Hola is set aside. ii. The matter is referred to Hola for sentencing. DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT GARISSA THIS 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2020. ……………….……………… C. KARIUKI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.