Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Muslims For Human Rights (muhuri) v 1. The Hon. Attorney General 2. Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Health 3. Inspector Generalof Police & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. 28 OF 2020 IN THE MATTER OF: ARTICLES 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27, 28, 35 AND 43 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA, 2010 AND IN THE MATTER: OF: CONTRAVENTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS UNDER ARTICLES 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27, 28, 35 AND 43 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA 2010 AND IN THE MATTER OF: ENFORCEMENT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS ENSHRINED UNDER ARTICLES 27, 28, 35 AND 43 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF: SECTION 27 AND 36 OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH ACT, CAP 242 LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF: THE PUBLIC HEALTH (PREVENTION, CONTROL AND SUPPRESSION OF COVID-19) RULES, 2020 BETWEEN MUSLIMS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (MUHURI).......................PETITIONER AND 1. THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL 2. CABINET SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH 3. INSPECTOR GENERALOF POLICE..............................RESPONDENTS COURT/RULING I have heard parties’ submissions on the two applications before the Court. In my view, the Covid-19 pandemic has caused a public confusion over standards and parameters along which we do things. In this pandemic, new directions emerge almost on a daily basis, and the Court also should not rush to make any orders without hearing parties substantively. Mr. Lumatete’s application raises novel issues of serious public concern. However, these issues should be canvassed in a robust way through

page 1 of 2

inter-partes hearing where every party is given a chance to make out their case. Mr. Makuto’s Preliminary Objection and Notice of Motion also raise serious issues which this Court cannot gloss over by giving interlocutory orders. The upshot is that this Court must have regard to any other similar matters which may have been filed in any other court registry in the country. Therefore, I will give the parties a chance to bring all evidence before the Court by way of full responses to their various applications. Accordingly, Mr. Makuto shall fully respond to Mr. Lumatete’s application dated 23/4/2020, and Mr. Lumatete shall also fully respond to Mr. Makuto’s Notice of Motion and Preliminary Objection both filed herein on 29/4/2020. The responses shall be done within six (6) days. The matters will be heard together on 6/5/2020 before the Duty Judge Hon. P. J. Otieno. Parties are directed to exchange submissions simultaneously and file soft copies in Court. The hearing will be via zoom. E. K. OGOLA JUDGE 29/4/2020

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.