REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 558 OF 2013 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF NASHON MALIKA LUBANGA Alias MALIKA LUBANGA (DECEASED) AND DINAH ANYONA MUTOKO..................PETITIONER VERSUS MUSA LUBANGA MATENDECHERE.....OBJECTOR RULING 1. Upon going through the court file I have noted that no summons for confirmation of grant have been applied for in the matter. Directions were given by Chitembwe J. on the 26/2/2014 for the petitioner to file an application for confirmation of grant but she never did so. She only filed an affidavit in support of her proposed mode of distribution without an accompanying application for confirmation of grant. 2. The objector on the other hand filed an affidavit in support of his proposed mode of distribution without an accompanying protest to the mode of distribution proposed by the petitioner. Parties proceeded to adduce evidence on their preferred mode of distribution of the estate when there was no summons for confirmation of grant applied for in the case to which the Objector could object/protest to. It is then clear that parties by-passed an important and mandatory procedure in a succession cause. No orders can issue in such a scenario. 3. In view of the foregoing I hereby direct the parties in the matter to make the necessary applications to align the matter with the provisions of the Probate and Administration Rules. Delivered, dated and signed at Kakamega this 5th day of June, 2020. J. N. NJAGI JUDGE Representation: No appearance for the Petitioner By consent of Miss Andia through e-mail for the Objector Petitioner - Absent Objector - Absent Court Assistant - Polycap 30 days right of appeal.
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.