Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

George Odhiambo v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 34 OF 2020 GEORGE ODHIAMBO.........APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.........................RESPONDENT RULING 1. It is over one year since judgment sought to be impugned was delivered. The Applicant was convicted for the offence of defilement under Section 8(1) as read with Section 8(2) of the Sexual Offences Act. His appeal was dismissed. 2. There is no evidence of points of law for consideration under Rule 113 of the Court of Appeal Rules. 3. There is also no evidence of pauperism. 4. The delay is inordinate. The application is found to be devoid of merit. 5. The same is declined and dismissed. 6. File closed. 7. Orders accordingly. Dated, signed and Delivered at Siaya this 7th Day of July 2020 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.