Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Franklin Musyoka v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NANYUKI CRIMINAL REVISION NO.116 OF 2020 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Nanyuki Criminal Case No.317 of 2020) FRANKLIN MUSYOKA...............................................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.................................................................................................................RESPONDENT 13/07/2020 Coram: Before Waweru, J (In chambers) ORDER IN REVISION 1. At the application of the convict herein, I have called for and examined the record of the trial court. 2. The convict, FRANKILIN MUSYOKA, was convicted upon his own plea of an offence under the Public Health (COVID-19 Restriction of Movement of Persons of Related Measures/Rules, 2020 made under the Public Health Act. He was fined Kshs.8,000/00 and in default to serve five (5) months imprisonment. He did not pay the fine and has been serving the sentence from 08/05/2020. 3. The convict’s complaint is with regard to the default sentence only. 4. The default sentence is illegal in view of Section 28(2) of the Penal Code; it should not have been more than three (3) months for a fine that does not exceed Kshs.15,000/00. 5. I will in t he circumstances set aside the default sentence and substitute therefore the period already served. 6. In the circumstances the convict that be set at liberty forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held. It is so ordered. GIVEN under my hand and seal of this Honourable Court this 13th day of July 2020 H.P.G. WAWERU

page 1 of 2

JUDGE. ISSUED at NANYUKI this 14th day of July 2020. DEPUTY REGISTRAR NANYUKI HIGH COURT

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.