Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Stephen Otieno Odhiambo v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 63 OF 2020 STEPHEN OTIENO ODHIAMBO.........................................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC............................................................................................RESPONDENT (Being an Application for Revision of sentence in Criminal Case No. 848 of 2016 of Principal Magistrate’s Court, Siaya dated 29.6.2017) RULING 1. I have considered the applicants’ application for revision of sentence on account that it is very harsh and excessive. The applicant STEPHEN OTIENO ODHIAMBO was convicted for the offence of attempted defilement and sentenced to serve 10 years imprisonment. He did not appeal against the conviction and sentence. 2. The sentence was lawful. 3. I find no merit in the application for sentence revision. 4. The application is dismissed. 5. File closed. Orders accordingly. Dated, signed and Delivered at Siaya this 9th Day of July 2020 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.