Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Daniel Oluoch Obudho v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 31 OF 2020 DANIEL OLUOCH OBUDHO......APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC..................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant’s application and supporting affidavit are at variance. 2. He applies for sentence review under Articles 23 and 50(2)(q) of the Constitution but the affidavit in support seeks for leave to appeal out time and as a pauper. 3. The court cannot tell what the Applicant seeks from court. The application is incompetent as this court cannot review sentence which it upheld on appeal. 4. Application dismissed. 5. File closed. 6. Orders accordingly. Dated, signed and Delivered at Siaya this 6th Day of July 2020 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.