Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Lucy Wairimu Ndirangu v M’itonga M’ituruchiu Julius Kinyua Mutonga

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 143 OF 2010 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE STANLEY MBURUGU M’ITONGA – DECEASED LUCY WAIRIMU NDIRANGU.............................APPLICANT VERSUS M’ITONGA M’ITURUCHIU JULIUS KINYUA MUTONGA........................ PETITIONERS RULING 1. On 19/11/2018 the parties herein entered into a consent and agreed that Kshs. 300,000 shall be paid to the widow of the deceased, Lucy Wairimu Ndirangu from the public trustee Embu. They also stated that the said account was unfrozen for the purpose of the order. 2. However, Mrs Ntaragwi advocate of the applicant/protestor indicated that the money that was being held at the Public trustee is Kshs. 830,000 and after the widow gets the Kshs. 300,000 a balance will remain. On 8/7/2020 she made an application that the balance of Kshs. 530,000 and interest be shared equally between the 3 children of the deceased. 3. It was held in In Re Estate of John Musambayi Katumanga – deceased [2014] eKLR Musyoka J, that:- “The spirit of Part V, especially Sections 35, 38 and 40, is equal distribution, of the intestate estate amongst the children of the deceased. There have been debates on whether the distribution should be equal or equitable. My reading of these provisions is that they envisage equal distribution for the word used in Sections 35(5) and 38 is ‘equally’ as opposed to ‘equitably’. This is the plain language of the provisions. The provisions are in mandatory terms – the property “shall … be equally divided among the surviving children.” Equal distribution is envisaged regardless of the ages, gender and financial status of the children.” 4. But, I wish to advance the debate on some quite different angle. While courts should be guided by the principle of equality in distribution of the estate of the deceased, they should be aware of other situations provided in the law of Succession Act, for instance, in section 26, 28 and 42 which may temper the symmetry. Just stating. 5. That notwithstanding, in light of the above, I order that the balance of Kshs. 530,000 (together with interest, if any) held by the Public Trustee be divided equally among the deceased’s surviving children, namely; I. Brenda Kathure II. Linnet Kananu III. Kennedy Kiogora 6. It is so ordered Dated, signed and delivered at Meru this 15th day of October 2020 ---------------------F. GIKONYO

page 1 of 2

JUDGE Representation Mrs. Ntarangwi for objector Mwiti for petitioners ---------------------F. GIKONYO JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.