Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Cni v Hjil & 3 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI FAMILY DIVISION SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 123 OF 2017 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JK DECEASED CNI........................................................APPLICANT VERSUS HJIL.......................1ST EXECUTOR/RESPONDENT MW........................2ND EXECUTOR/RESPONDENT RSK.......................3RD EXECUTOR/RESPONDENT PSK.......................4TH EXECUTOR/RESPONDENT RULING 1. The application subject of this ruling is dated 28 th January, 2020 brought under Section 26 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 45(1) of Probate and Administration Rules where the applicant CNI seeks for provision from the estate of the deceased. 2. The applicant’s claim is based on the assertion that she was born of one JKT and the deceased herein and on the fact that she was not provided for in the deceased Will. She claims further that the deceased provided and maintained her since birth. In support she produced a birth certificate, pictures and a copy of a tribute she wrote upon the deceased death. 3. The application was not opposed. 4. In a similar application by one CK the court issued an order on the 13 th February 2020. Similarly, in this application it appears that the other beneficiaries do not oppose the inclusion and consideration of the applicant as beneficiary of the estate. I therefore direct and order that at the point of confirmation of the grant the Executors of the Will do make reasonable provision for the applicant from the residue of the estate. 5. Costs in the cause. DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 15th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2020. ALI-ARONI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.