Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Bedrock Holdings Limited v Bedrock Security Services Limited & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU (CORAM: CHERERE-J) CIVIL SUIT NO.134 OF 2009 BEDROCK HOLDINGS LIMITED.........................PLAINTIFF/ APPLICANT VERSUS BEDROCK SECURITY SERVICES LIMITED...................1ST RESPONDENT ERICK OUMA OKEYO..........................................................2 ND RESPONDENT PATRICK OCHIENG ODIPO................................................3 RD RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Plaintiff/Applicant’s suit was on 01.08.19 dismissed with costs to the Respondents. 2. By Chamber Summons dated 24.08.2020 the Applicant prays for stay of execution of taxed costs pending the hearing and determination of a reference and appeal. 3. Mr. David Otieno, advocate for the Respondents in his replying affidavit sworn on 09.09.2020 opposes the application on the ground that no appeal has been filed and that a reference is no bar to execution. 4. I have carefully considered the reference in the light of the affidavits on record. 5. The substantive law of access for the relief sought is Order 42 (6) of the Civil Procedure Rules which provides: (2) No order for stay of execution shall be made under sub rule (1) Unless— a. The court is satisfied that substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made b. That the application has been made without unreasonable delay; and c. Such security as the court orders for the due performance of such decree or order as may ultimately be binding on him has been given by the applicant. 6. Substantial loss, in its various forms is the corner stone of best jurisdictions for granting a stay and the party seeking stay bears a specific burden regarding proof of substantial loss. (See Rhoda Mukuma v John Abuoga[1988] eKLR). 7. The reference relating to the taxed costs was dismissed by an order dated 21.10.2020. The Plaintiff/Applicant has not alleged or demonstrated that the Defendants/Respondents would be unable to adequately refund the taxed costs should the intended appeal ultimately succeed. 8. Consequently, the Chamber Summons dated 12.06.2020 is without merit and it is dismissed. DATED AT KISUMU THIS 23rd DAY OF October 2020

page 1 of 2

T. W. CHERERE JUDGE Court Assistants - Ms. Amondi/Ms. Okodoi For Applicant - Mr. Otieno for Owiti, Otieno & Ragot Advocate For Respondent - Mr. Mwamu for Mwamu & Co. Advocates

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.