REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 79 OF 2017 HILLARY SINDICHI CHIKUNZIA ......... APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ................................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant has filed an application dated 29 th August, 2017 seeking for orders that he be served with a copy of the trial proceedings in Vihiga Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. 27 of 2012 and the records of appeal in Kakamega HCCRA. No. 188 of 2013 so as to enable him lodge an appeal with the Court of Appeal, Kisumu. 2. The application was filed by the applicant in person. Later on Mr. Malalah, Advocate, came in record for him. The matter henceforth proceeded as if the application before the court was one for re-sentencing for the offence of robbery with violence. Mr. Malalah filed mitigation for the applicant and a probation officer submitted a pre-sentencing report. 3. From the foregoing, it is clear that the application before the court is for the applicant to be supplied with copies of proceedings and judgment of both the trial at the lower court and the appeal at Kakamega High Court. The application proceeded on the mistaken belief that it was one for re-sentencing which it never was. I can only grant the applicant the orders sought in the application dated 29/8/2017. 4. In the premises, I do order the court’s Deputy Registrar to supply the applicant with the documents sought in his application dated 29/8/2019. Delivered, dated and signed at Kakamega this 15th day of October, 2020. J. NYAGA NJAGI JUDGE In the presence of: No appearance for Applicant Mr. Mutua for respondent Applicant – present through video link to G.K. Prison, Kakamega Court Assistant - Polycap
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.