Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ex parte Applicant v Respondent (Judicial Review)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 19 OF 2020 BETWEEN REPUBLIC................................................................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS TECHNICAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION TRAINING AUTHORITY.....RESPONDENT EX PARTE APPLICANT: ALISON COMMUNITY BASED ORGANISATION RULING 1. 0n 13th July 2020, this Court granted the ex parte Applicant the last opportunity to files and serves skeletal submissions on the prayer for stay in its Chamber Summons dated 24th January 2020, and to also file and serve its submissions on the substantive Notice of Motion dated 29th January 2020, failing which the suit would be dismissed. The Respondent was also granted leave to file and serve reply submissions within thirty days of service. 2. Upon perusal of the Court record, I note that the ex parte Applicant has not complied with the directions to file submissions, while the Respondent filed submissions dated 10th June 2020. 3. In the premises I hereby order as follows: I. The prayer for stay in the ex parte Applicant’s Chamber Summons application dated 24th January 2020 and the ex parte Applicant’s Notice of Motion dated 29th January 2020 are hereby dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs, and this case is accordingly marked as closed. II. The Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division shall send a copy of this ruling to the ex parte Applicant and Respondent by electronic mail by close of business on Thursday, 12th November 2020. 4. Orders accordingly. DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 P. NYAMWEYA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.