REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BOMET CRIMINAL CASE NO. 14 OF 2020 REPUBLIC.........................................................................DPP VERSUS EMMANUEL KIRUI alias KIMONDA...............ACCUSED RULING 1. The Accused Emmanuel Kirui alias Kimonda is charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code Cap 63 Laws of Kenya. The particulars of the offence are that on the 5 th day of July, 2020 at Nyamarenda village Kaptebengwet location in Konoin Sub - County within Bomet County murdered Bernard Biegon. 2. The Accused took plea on 22 nd October, 2020 and denied the charge. His counsel, Ms Chepkemoi promptly made an application for the Accused to be granted bond pending trial. Learned counsel submitted that the Accused was not a flight risk and would abide by any conditions imposed by the court. On his part, Mr Mureithi the learned prosecution counsel requested the court to order a social inquiry report. 3. When the matter came up for hearing on 25 th November, 2020, Mr. Mureithi submitted that the prosecution had no objection to the Accused being granted bond if the pre- bail report was favourable to the Accused. On her part, defence counsel urged the court to grant reasonable bond terms. 4. I have considered the application, the respective submissions of counsel and the probation officer’s report dated 3 rd November, 2020. The right to bail is provided by Article 49 of the Constitution. The only limitation to that right is the existence of compelling reasons. As is now settled practice, it is the duty of the State to demonstrate to the court the existence of compelling reasons. In this case, the prosecution did not oppose the application for bond. Instead, Counsel urged the court to consider the probation report. 5. The probation report indicates that the Accused was a law abiding and peace loving citizen prior to the charge he is facing. That he was a mason who undertook his business without conflict. According to the report, both his family and that of the deceased supported his release on bond. It is apparent therefore that the pre bail report was favourable to the Accused. I find that there is no compelling reason to deny the accused bond. 6. The Accused is granted bail on the following conditions:i. He shall pay cash bail of kshs. 300,000/= with one surety of similar amount. ii. In the alternative, the accused shall execute a personal bond of kshs 300,000/= and provide 2 sureties of Kshs. 300,000/= each. iii. He shall attend court whenever required and shall not impede the trial in any way. 7. Orders accordingly. Ruling delivered, dated and signed this 3rd day of December, 2020. ............................... R. LAGAT-KORIR JUDGE Ruling delivered in the presence of the Accused, Defence Counsel Ms Chepkemoi, Mr. Mureithi for the DPP, and Kiprotich (Court Assistant).
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.