Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Commercial and Tax Division v Trident Insurance Company Limited

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI COMMERCIAL AND TAX DIVISION CIVIL SUIT NO. 389 OF 2017 SAHAM ASSURANCE COMPANY KENYA LIMITED..................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS TRIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED............................................DEFENDANT JUDGMENT 1. SAHAM ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, the plaintiff filed this case against TRIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, the defendant. This case was referred to Mediation that is the court Annexed Mediation. The defendant failed to file a case summary in accordance with the Mediation Practice directions 2017 and on 13th June 2019. When the defendant was required to show cause why the court should not take action for its aforestated failure, the defendant failed to attend court. Accordingly the court, in the absence of any cause being shown by the defendant the defendant’s defence was on that date struck out. 2. The case proceeded for hearing on 17th September 2019 by way of plaintiff formally proving its case. 3. The evidence of the plaintiff was led by Sarah Weru the plaintiff’s senior legal officer. 4. The said witness stated in evidence that the plaintiff insured Tusker Mattresses Limited (Tuskys) for the period between 1st March 2015 and 1st March 2016. The defendant contractually took up 40% of the risk upon re-insuring Tuskys. 5. On 17th May 2015 one of Tuskys branches caught fire which led to claims being made by Tuskys for material damage and loss of profit. An adjuster was appointed and all reinsurers, including the defendant were notified. The material damage claim was adjusted at Ksh 67,517,001/= and the adjustment fee for that claim was Ksh 1,851,360/=. The defendant’s liability for 40% of the claim was Ksh 27,747.40. The loss of profit was fully adjusted at Ksh 72,706,725/= and the adjusters fees was Ksh 928,000/= The defendant’s liability at 40% of that claim is Ksh 29,453,885.60. The defendant on receiving demand to pay, from the plaintiff, only made partial payment. The defendant’s total liability together with interest and costs of recovery is Ksh 33,427,695.61 as at 16 th August, 2017. 6. The plaintiff has made several demands of settlement of the amount due but the defendant has failed to settle the same. It is on that basis plaintiff prays for judgment for Ksh 33,427,695.61 as at 16th August 2017 together with interest and costs. 7. Since there is no defence to the plaintiff’s claim and because the plaintiff’s claim is supported by document, I find the plaintiff’s claim is merited. CONCLUSION 8. Accordingly the judgment of the court is as follows: 9. a. Judgment is hereby entered for the plaintiff against the defendant for Ksh 33,427,695.61 with interest at court rate from the date of filing suit until payment in full. b. The plaintiff is awarded costs of the suit. DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 4th day OCTOBER, 2019.

page 1 of 2

MARY KASANGO JUDGE Judgment Read and Delivered in Open Court in the presence of: Sophie..................................COURT ASSISTANT ..........................................FOR THE PLAINTIFF .......................................FOR THE DEFENDANT

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.