REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS FAMILY DIVISION SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 877 OF 2007 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JANE WAMBUI GATONYE (DECEASED) LUCY NYOKABI WAMBUI …………PETITIONER/APPLICANT VERSUS HELLEN WANGARE WAMBUI ……OBJECTOR/RESPONDENT RULING 1. The ruling that is sought to be appealed from was delivered on 19 th November 2018. It was scheduled to be delivered on 31 st October 2018 but was not. Notice was sent to the counsel for 19 th January 2018. The advocate of the applicant Lucy Nyokabi Wambui states that they were not served with the notice. The respondent Hellen Wangare Wambui similarly states that they did not receive the notice, but that cannot be true because on the day of the ruling there was counsel holding brief for her advocate. The present application for leave to extend time for the filing of the appeal against the ruling was filed on 19 th December 2018. The applicant was late in filing the appeal by 16 days. She states that her advocate became aware of the ruling on 3 rd December 2018, and on the same day wrote to the court for proceedings. 2. I consider that the right to appeal is a constitutional one. Where one seeks to appeal out of time he has to explain the delay to the satisfaction of the court (Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat –v- IEBC & 7 Others [2011]eKLR). The explanation for the delay (the claim that counsel did not receive the ruling notice) was not materially challenged. I determine that the delay was for a short period, and has been satisfactorily explained. I exercise my discretion and allow the application. I allow the applicant 7 days to file and serve the Notice of Appeal. 3. On whether the proceedings should be stayed pending the hearing and determination of the appeal that is intended to be filed, I consider that such jurisdiction is exercised under Order 42 rule 6(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules. There has to be an appeal already filed before such jurisdiction can be invoked. Secondly, the merits of the appeal would not be a consideration for this court. 4. I further consider that the cause was filed in 2007. The deceased left an estate when she died on 28 th December 2006. She left a Will whose executor was the applicant. The beneficiaries of the Will were the applicant and her late brother John Ngugi who was survived by his widow Jane Wanjiku Ngugi. The respondent and her sister Susan Ann Wanjiku received no provision. The ruling sought to be challenged reinstated the respondent’s objection to the petition and challenge of the Will. It is clear to me that considering how long this matter has been in court, no serious prejudice will be occasioned by this court proceeding to hear the dispute, even as the applicant proceeds with the appeal process. 5. In conclusion, I refuse the request to stay the proceedings. 6. The applicant has been indulged. She will pay the costs of the application. DATED and SIGNED at NAIROBI this 22ND day of MAY 2019 A.O. MUCHELULE JUDGE DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 28TH day of MAY 2019 J.N. ONYIEGO JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.