Charles Kagorwe M'runji v Grace Kambura

(a) Karingani/Mariani/5731 (i) Esther Nkima Samuel jointly (ii) Simon Mbogo M'Runchi (b) Karingani/Mariani/1983 Charles Kagorwe M'Runchi (c) Karingani/Ndagani/5770 Joyce Muthoni Kamundi (d) Karingani/Ndagani/7398 (i) Boniface Kinyua E. Mwarania - 0.10 acres (ii) John Miriti Bore - 0.19 acres (e) Karingani/Ndagani/8172 Boniface Kinyua E. Mwarania (f) Karingani/Ndagani/8170 Julius Nanua M'Runji (g) Karingani/Mariani/2780 Peter Mugambi Mutitu (h) Karingani/Ndagani/8169 Humprey Murangiri (i) Karingani/Ndagani/8171 Charles Kagorwe M'Runji (j) Karingani/Mariani/8320 Sparenza Muthoni Nyaga (k) Karingani/Mariani/6000 Patrick Murithi Muchiri (l) Karingani/Mariani/6729 Patrick Murithi Muchiri (m) Karingani/Mariani/9100 Patrick Murithi Muchiri

page 2 of 4

(n) Karingani/Mariani/5770 Joyce Muthoni Kamundi 4. James Mugendi Stephen one of the protestors herein filed a protest stating that he had purchaser's interest on parcel No. Karingani/Ndagani/8320 and enclosed or exhibited copies of agreement, payment acknowledgements and a consent from Land Control Board that indicates that the deceased herein sold the stated parcel to him. 5. Grace Kambura, another protestor filed another protest claiming that she was a wife to the deceased and faulted the administrator for not recognizing her. She further accused the administrator for distributing the estate to purchasers to her detriment and that of her children. 6. The court listed the protest for hearing by way of oral evidence. It transpired at the hearing that the petitioner/administrator perhaps under some influence on the first date of hearing could not really tell this court much about the estate. He told this court that he is aware that the deceased had sold some parcels to some purchasers but he could not tell which parcels were sold and to whom. This forced this court to adjourn the hearing. When the hearing resumed at a later date, the administrator told this court that he could not trace the details of some purchasers though he stated the purchasers had some agreements. 7. On the other hand Grace Kambura testified that she used to work for the deceased as a maid and that because the deceased did not have a wife, she became his wife and got 3 children together. When pressed to show birth certificates of the children, the witness stated that she had none. She availed one witness Chibira Muiru Kabunja, who testified that she knew Grace Kambura as the wife of the deceased and knew she had got 3 children. Apart from that there is not much offered in terms of cogent evidence to demonstrate that she was married to the decesed. 8. This court has considered the protests filed in this court and the response made by the petitioner. This court notes that one of the protestor's James Mugendi Stephen, did not turn up for hearing of his protest but that notwithstanding I find from the affidavit of protest filed sworn on 28th October, 2017 and the annextures (Agreement, acknowledgment of payments, and consent from Land Control Board Meru South) that Stephen Mugendi Stephen purchased parcel No. Karingani/Ndagani/8320 from deceased. The petitioner himself admitted during hearing that he was aware that the deceased had sold some of the parcels and that the purchasers had agreements. This court is satisfied that Stephen Mugendi Stephen has legitimate interests in the parcel No. Karingani/Ndagani/8320 and is entitled to that parcel as a creditor to the estate. The deceased took him to Land Control Board who granted consent to the transaction. The acquisition was therefore legitimate and lawful. 9. In regard to Grace Kambura, the other protestor in this cause, this court was told that the said Grace Kambura was a wife to deceased but the protestor did not adduce any evidence to show how she was married to the deceased, whether it was a customary marriage or engagement or whether it was a formal marriage. She testified that she was employed as a maid to look after the deceased who from the death certificate appears was fairly old. This court inquired from the witness who appeared fairly young how old she was and she stated that she was 36 years old. Although the question of age difference is not much of an issue, to determine if a person is married to the other, it is important to note that he who alleges must prove When asked to show birth certificates of the children to prove that the deceased was their father, the 2nd protestor simply could not. She did not give reasons why the children did have birth certificate. Her evidence in this court left a lot to be desired that in the end I find that she has not proved her case that she was a legal wife to the deceased to the required standard. 10. This court for the aforesaid reason hereby confirms the grant issued on 21 st January, 2016 as per the following mode of distribution: (a) Karingani/Mariani/5731 (i) Esther Nkima Samuel jointly (ii) Simon Mbogo M'Runchi (b) Karingani/Mariani/1983 Charles Kagorwe M'Runchi (c) Karingani/Ndagani/5770 Joyce Muthoni Kamundi (d) Karingani/Ndagani/7398 (i) Boniface Kinyua Mwaranja (ii) John Miriti Bore (e) Karingani/Ndagani/8172 - 0.1 acres 0.19 acres

page 3 of 4

Boniface Kinyua Mwaranja (f) Karingani/Ndagani/8320 James Mugendi Stephen (g) Karingani/Mariani/8170 Julius Namu M'Runji (h) Karingani/Ndagani/2780 Peter Mugambi Mutitu (i) Karingani/Ndagani/8169 Humprey Murangiri Seberino (j) Karingani/Mariani/8171 Charles Kagorwe M'Runchi (k) Karingani/Mariani/6000 Patrick Murithi Muchiri (l) Karingani/Mariani/6729 Sparenza Muthoni Nyaga (m) Karingani/Mariani/9100 Patrick Murithi Muchiri (n) Karingani/Mariani/5770 Joyce Muthoni Kamundi There shall be no order as to costs. Each party to bear own costs. Dated, signed, and delivered at Chuka this 28th day of January, 2019. R.K. LIMO JUDGE 28/1/2019 Judgment signed dated and delivered in the open court in presence of petitioner in person, the protestor and all the parties. R.K. LIMO JUDGE 28/1/2019

page 4 of 4