Eric Samson Mbui Gatimu & 1 other v Samson Mbui Gatimu

Jeremiah Muchiri Gatimu – 0.9 acres James Gitari Gatimu – 0.9 acres Jamlick Njagi Gatimu – 0.9 acres Esther Muthoni Gatimu Grace Kabuci Muthike 0.9 Acres Jointly Janet Wagacigi Gatimu (b) Mukarara Plot No. 10 Esther Muthoni Gatimu – whole share (c) Kutus Plot No. 49 A Esther Muthon iGatimu – whole share (d) Kutus Plot No. 38 Esther Muthoni Gatimu – whole share (e) Gatugura Village Plot No. 75 Esther Muthoni Gatimu – whole share (f) KDCU Kerugoya account No. 0409-02-115 Esther Muthoni Gatimu (g Mau-Mau Trust Account Esther Muthoni Gatimu 4. She proceeded to file another application for confirmation of grant on10/03/2011 and proposed that the deceased’s estates be determined as follows; (i) Kabare/Mutige/242 Samuel Muriuki Gatimu – 0.9 acres Erick Samon Mbui – 0.9 acres Samson Mbui Gatimu – 0.9 acres Jeremiah Muchiri Gatimu – 0.9 acres James Gitari Gatimu – 0.9 acres Jamlick Njagi Gatimu – 0.9 acres Esther Muthoni Gatimu – 0.9 acres ii. Mukarara Plot No. 10 Esther Muthoni Gatimu – whole share iii. Kutus Plot No. 38

page 2 of 6

Esther Muthoni Gatimu – whole share Protest was filed by Mbui Gatimu vide affidavit sworn on 28/3/2011. Protestor’s Case 5. Samson Mbui Gatimu proceeded to file an affidavit in protest on 28/03/2011 and stated that the petitioner left out some beneficiaries and some of the estate of the deceased. He proposed the estate should be distributed as follows; a. Kabare/Mutige/242 Samuel Muriuki Gatimu – 0.9 acres Erick Samon Mbui – 0.9 acres Samson Mbui Gatimu – 0.9 acres Jeremiah Muchiri Gatimu – 0.9 acres James Gitari Gatimu – 0.9 acres Jamlick Njagi Gatimu – 0.9 acres Esther Muthoni Gatimu } Grace Kabuci Gatimu } – 0.9 acres jointly Janet Wagachigi Gatimu } (b) Mukarara Plot No. 10 Jamleck Njagi Gatimu James Gitari Gatimu – jointly in equal shares Eric Samson Mbui Gatimu (c) Kutus Plot No. 49A Samson Mbui Gatimu } Janet Wagachigi Gatimu } – jointly in equal shares Grace Kabuci Gatimu } d. Kutus Plot No. 38 Samuel Muriuki Gatimu } Esther Muthoni Gatimu } – jointly in equal shares Jeremiah Muchiri Gatimu } 6. The Court in its ruling dated 25/01/2013 stated that the administrator has not been able to identify the assets which make up the estate, therefore the proposal to distribute the estate was premature. That the administrator must first identify the assets and collect them and obtain documentary proof of ownership before proposing distribution. 7. The petitioner proceeded to file an affidavit for confirmation of grant wherein she identified the estates of the deceased and proposed distribution as follows; 1. Kabare/Mutige/242 Samuel Muriuki Gatimu – 0.9 acres

page 3 of 6

Erick Samon Mbui – 0.9 acres Samson Mbui Gatimu – 0.9 acres Jeremiah Muchiri Gatimu – 0.9 acres James Gitari Gatimu – 0.9 acres Jamlick Njagi Gatimu – 0.9 acres Esther Muthoni Gatimu Grace Kabuci Gatimu – 0.9 acres jointly Janet Wagachigi Gatimu 2. Mukarara Plot No. 10 Esther Muthoni Gatimu – whole share 3. Kutus Plot No. 38 Esther Muthoni Gatimu – whole share 8. The protestor also filed an affidavit of protest on 17/06/2015 whereby he was agreeable to the mode of distribution proposed save for Kutus Plot No. 49A which she had not included. He annexed documentation to prove that the same belonged to the deceased.He proposed that the said Plot be given to him solely since the other beneficiaries are not interested. 9. A consent was filed on 08/03/2016 by the all the other beneficiaries except the protestor whereby they consented to the mode of distribution proposed by the petitioner. In addition, Kutus Plot No. 49A be given to the petitioner in whole share. 10. Unfortunately the administrator passed away and was substituted by Eric Samson Mbui Gatimu and Jeremiah Muchiri Gatimu. They proposed distribution of the estate as hereunder; 1. Kabare/Mutige/242 Samuel Muriuki Gatimu – 0.9 acres Erick Samon Mbui – 0.9 acres Samson Mbui Gatimu – 0.9 acres Jeremiah Muchiri Gatimu – 0.9 acres James Gitari Gatimu – 0.9 acres Jamlick Njagi Gatimu – 0.9 acres Grace Kabuci Gatimu – 0.9 acres jointly Janet Wagachigi Gatimu 2. Mukarara Plot No. 10 – Equal Shares Samuel Muriuki Gatimu Erick Samon Mbui Samson Mbui Gatimu Jeremiah Muchiri Gatimu James Gitari Gatimu

page 4 of 6

Jamlick Njagi Gatimu Grace Kabuci Gatimu Janet Wagachigi Gatimu 3. Kutus Plot No. 49A– Equal Shares Samuel Muriuki Gatimu Erick Samon Mbui Samson Mbui Gatimu Jeremiah Muchiri Gatimu James Gitari Gatimu Jamlick Njagi Gatimu Grace Kabuci Gatimu Janet Wagachigi Gatimu 4. Kutus Plot No. 38– Equal Shares Samuel Muriuki Gatimu Erick Samon Mbui Samson Mbui Gatimu Jeremiah Muchiri Gatimu James Gitari Gatimu Jamlick Njagi Gatimu Grace Kabuci Gatimu Janet Wagachigi Gatimu 11. During hearing the protestor confirmed he was agreeable to the distribution of Kabare/Mutige/242. However since the petitioners had indicated they are not interested in Kutus Plot No. 49Athe same should be given to him andthereafter he will have no interest in Mukarara Plot No. 10 and Kutus Plot No. 38. The issue which arises for determination is distribution of the estate. 12. Since all the beneficiaries and list of properties have been confirmed, it will be fair for the same to be distributed equally to all of them as proposed by the petitioners. The proposal that the protestor gets whole share of Kutus Plot No. 49A is not justifiable. Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act Cap 160 Laws of Kenya provides:- The provision provides for the distribution of the net estate to all the children equally. This requires that each child gets an equal share. 13. The protestor states that he should get plot No. 49A Kutus as his brothers had said they don’t know it and that it is in court. He admits that the plot is developed with a building which was built by his late father. The plot No. 49A Kutus belongs to the estate of the deceased and is available for distribution to the beneficiaries in equal share. I find that there is no justification by the protestor that the plot be given to him exclusively. The proposal by the protestor is contrary to the spirit of Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act . I see no reason why the protestor should get the plot exclusively. The plot should be shared equally by all the beneficiaries. The upshot is that the protest is without merits. I dismiss it. I order that the estate be distributed as proposed by the petitioner. 14. In conclusion:1. The protest by Samson Mbui Gatimu is without merits and is dismissed. 2. The grant issued on 9/6/06 is confirmed.

page 5 of 6

3. The estate of the deceased comprised in:(a) - Kabare/Mutige/242 (b) Mukarara Plot No. 10 (c) Kutus Plot No 49A (d) Kutus Plot No. 38. Be shared equally among the beneficiaries safe for Plot No. 242 where Grace Kabuci Gatimu and Janet Wagachigi Gatimu shall get 0.9 acres jointly. 15. No orders as to costs. Dated at Kerugoya this 7th day of February 2019. L. W. GITARI JUDGE

page 6 of 6