Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

M.s. Shariff & Company Advocates v Omari Mbwana Zonga

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA MISC. APPLICATION NO. 44 OF 2014 M.S. SHARIFF & COMPANY ADVOCATES....................APPLICANT VERSUS OMARI MBWANA ZONGA............................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. The application due for hearing today was served upon the Respondent on the 8/11/2016. On 16/12/2016 Mr. Asige’s firm came on record by filling a Notice of appointment but that notice was never served hence it has not taken effect and therefore Mr. Asige is not on record and has no right of audience leave alone the right to seek and obtain an adjournment. 2. The application even though served then has never elicited any response and is thus unopposed. 3. Having considered it on the basis of the court record, I do consider it merited as there is no contest as to retainer and the certificate of costs has become final. 4. I thus allow the application dated 12/10/2016 and enter judgment for the Advocate/Applicant in the sum of Kshs.593,187.30 plus interest thereon at 14% p.a. from the date of the certificate of costs till payment in full. Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 2nd day of April 2019. P.J.O. OTIENO JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.