Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Jared Onyiego Rasugu v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYAMIRA CORAM: D.S MAJANJA J. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 65 OF 2017 JARED ONYIEGO RASUGU..........................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC......................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the original conviction and sentence of Hon. A.C Towett – RM dated 21st September 2017 at the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Nyamira in Criminal Case No. 4 of 2016) JUDGMENT 1. The appellant, JARED ONYIEGO RASUGU, was charged with the offence of attempted defilement contrary to section 9(1) of the Sexual Offences Act (‘the Act’). The particulars of the offence were that on 7 th January 2016 at [particulars withheld] Village, Borabu District within Nyamira County, he intentionally and unlawfully attempted to cause his penis to penetrate the anus of SO, a child aged 10 years. 2. In his petition of appeal aptly titled “Mitigation of Appeal”, the appellant does not contest the sentence. He states that it is excessive and in his plea to the court he submits that he is remorseful and has reformed. He prays for a more lenient sentence. 3. Regretfully and as submitted by Mr. Otieno, the respondent’s counsel, the sentence of 10 years imprisonment is mandatory minimum sentence under section 9(2) of the Act and the court has no discretion to vary it. As my hands are tied by the law, I now dismiss this appeal. Dated and delivered at Kisii this 5th day of April 2019. D.S MAJANJA JUDGE Mr. Otieno, Senior Prosecution Counsel, instructed by Office of Director of Prosecutions. Appellant in person.

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.