REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA MISC. APPLICATION NO. 108 OF 2019 MBURU KARIUKI & CO. ADVOCATES...................................................APPLICANT VERSUS INVESCO ASSURANCE CO. LTD...........................................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. For purposes of efficient use of judicial time, the 70 files identified and enumerated at Prayer 1 of the Notice of Motion are consolidated with this file. 2. There being certificates of taxation duly issued against which no challenge has been made and thus have become final, and in the absence of a dispute as to retainer, I do enter judgment for the Advocate/Applicant in the aggregate sum of Kshs.6,101,041.00 with interest thereon at court rates from the date today till payment in full. 3. Let this order be extracted and placed in each of the files and all the 71 files be put together to avoid any confusion. 4. This being a matter involving an advocate/client bill of costs in which no further taxation may be undertaken and taking into account the need to achieve affordable costs of litigation, I award to the Advocate/Applicant the costs of these proceeding which I assess in the sum of Kshs.10,000.00 all inclusive. Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 25th day of March 2019. P.J.O. OTIENO JUDGE
Original judgment
Mburu Kariuki & Co. Advocates v Invesco Assurance Co. Ltd
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.