High Court 7382 of 2019

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KIAMBU ADOPTION CASE NO 24 OF 2017 IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF L. A. aka L. A. MINOR BY D.H.M.......................................................1ST APPLICANT A.W.H......................................................2ND APPLICANT JUDGMENT 1. The Applicants herein are DHM. (aged 57 years) and AWH. (aged 54 years). They have been married since 1988 and are Kenyan nationals. They have four adult children, three sons and a daughter. The applicants wish to adopt LA aka LA, a female minor currently aged about 15 years. The Applicants profess the Christian faith and are gainfully employed as pastor and lecturer, respectively. Their gross income is about KShs.380,000/= per month and they own several parcels of land. They reside at [particulars withheld] estate, Muthaiga North. 2. According to the material on record, the Subject herein was born in 2004. The Subject was found abandoned on 11th June 2004 at the age of 3 months within a Kangemi area. Her alleged father JMJ. failed to respond to summonses by the area chief, Kangemi and eventually she was admitted into Happy Life Children’s Home in January 2005. The matter was reported to Kasarani Police Station vide OB No. 26 of 2 nd September, 2014. 3. In March 2006 the subject was committed to the Happy Life Childrens Home in Protection and Care Case No. 42 of 2006 at Milimani Children’s Court, Nairobi. Neither the alleged father nor the subject’s mother came forward to claim her. The Subject was declared free for adoption on 14th November 2006 vide certificate No.[XXX] issued by Buckner Kenya Adoption Services. After 11 years at the children’s home, the Subject was placed in the care of the Applicants under a foster care agreement dated 21 st November, 2016. Since then, she has remained under the care of the Applicants. 4. Reports were filed by the adoption society and by the children officer and the Guardian ad litem. These reports confirm the Applicants’ emotional and financial capacity to care for and to provide for the upkeep and education of the Subject. The adoption is recommended in all the reports especially because the Subject has bonded well with her new family and the fact that the Applicants are in a stable relationship. 5. According to the guardian ad litem, the Subject has developed a good relationship with her prospective siblings, majority of whom no longer live with the Applicants, being adults. On record are duly signed consents by the Applicants’ children. The children officer’s report indicates that the family members interviewed were in support of the adoption. The motivation for the adoption is ultruistic; the Applicants have a love for under privileged children and in this case, desire to give the Subject a home and family. 6. The court is obligated in considering the adoption application to uphold the best interests of the child (see Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section 4(3) of the children Act. The Applicants herein in my view fulfil the requirements for a local adoption under the Children Act,

page 1 of 2