REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU (CORAM: CHERERE-J) JUDICIAL REVIEW MISC APPLICATION NO. 06 OF 2019 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY GALEXON KENYA LIMITED FOR AN ORDER OF MANDAMUS COMPELLING THE CHIEF OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF TRADE, INDUSTRY, TOURISM & ENTERPRENEURSHIP, COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF VIHIGA AND COUNTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBER FOR FINANCE, COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF VIHIGA TO PAY DECRETAL SUM TOGETHER WITH COSTS PURSUANT TO KISUMU HCCC 18 OF 2017 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT ACT, 2012 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC FINANCE ACT, 2012 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE FAIR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ACT, 2015 BETWEEN REPUBLIC...............................................................................APPLICANT AND CHIEF OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF TRADE, INDUSTRY, TOURISM & ENTERPRENEURSHIP COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF VIHIGA.....................................1ST RESPONDENT COUNTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBER FOR FINANCE COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF VIHIGA.................2ND RESPONDENT EXPARTE APPLICANT: GALEXON KENYA LIMITED RULING 1. By a Notice of Motion dated 02nd May, 2019 and filed on 21st May, 2019, the ex parte applicant herein, seeks the following orders: 1) That leave be granted to the applicant herein to apply for Judicial Review Order to wit, an Order of Mandamus commanding Chief Officer Department of Trade, Industry, Tourism & Enterpreneurship, County Government of Vihiga and County Executive Committee Member for Finance, County Government of Vihiga to settle the decretal sum together with costs as awarded in KISUMU HCCC 18 OF 2017 2) That costs provided for
page 1 of 2
2. According to the Applicant, it obtained a decree in KISUMU HCCC 18 OF 2017 requiring the County Government of Vihiga to pay it Kshs. 21,798,450/- together with interest and costs. 3. Cyril Mukhunji Makatiani in his verifying affidavit sworn on 02 nd May, 2019 and filed on 21 st May, 2019 avers that the decree was served upon the respondents who have failed to settle the decretal sum. 4. The issue for determination is whether this Court ought to grant the order sought herein. 5. Under the County Governments Act No. 17 of 2012, the County Executive in Charge of Finance or by whatever other name the officer may be described, is the one under obligation to pay funds, in the capacity of the accounting officer. 6. It must always be remembered that a judicial review application is neither a criminal case nor a civil suit hence the application ought to be brought against the person who is bound to comply with the orders sought therein (See Republic v County Chief Officer, Finance & Economic Planning, Nairobi City County Ex Parte Stanley Muturi [2016] eKLR ). In this case the 2 nd Respondent is the Accounting Officer of the County Government of Vihiga. 7. The Applicant has not demonstrated that the decree was served on the County Executive in Charge of Finance. The contention that the said officer has declined to settle the decretal sum is therefore unsustainable. Order 8. In the result I disallow the Notice of Motion 02nd May, 2019 and filed on 21st May, 2019 with no order for costs. DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED THIS 27th DAY OF June, 2019 T. W. CHERERE JUDGE In the presence ofCourt Assistant - Felix For Petitioner/Applicant - Mr. Kaniaru 1st Respondent - N/A 2nd Respondent - N/A
page 2 of 2