Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Paul Wambua Kiema v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITUI CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 12 OF 2019 PAUL WAMBUA KIEMA....................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC........................................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. Paul Wambua Kiema was convicted of the offence of Rape contrary to Section 3(1) as read with Section 3(3) of the Sexual Offences Act on the 3rd June, 2016. He was sentenced to ten (10) years imprisonment. 2. Satisfied by the conviction and sentence meted out he opted not to appeal. 3. On the 25th February, 2019 he filed a Notice of Motion seeking to appeal out of time on the ground that the Court delayed in providing him with a copy of the Judgment. However, at the hearing of the Application he stated that he never appealed at the outset because he was satisfied with the sentence meted out but he wished to appeal because the time he spent in custody during trial was not taken into consideration. 4. Section 349 of the Criminal Procedure Code provides thus: “An appeal shall be entered within fourteen days of the date of the order or sentence appealed against: Provided that the court to which the appeal is made may for good cause admit an appeal after the period of fourteen days has elapsed, and shall so admit an appeal if it is satisfied that the failure to enter the appeal within that period has been caused by the inability of the appellant or his advocate to obtain a copy of the judgment or order appealed against, and a copy of the record, within a reasonable time of applying to the court therefor.” 5. This is a matter where the Applicant did not seek to obtain a copy of the Judgment following contentment of Judgment of the trial Court which imposed the minimum sentence prescribed for the offence he committed. He has waited for three (3) years prior to remembering that he could be heard at an appellate stage. This does not amount to a good cause. 6. Therefore, the Application is not meritorious. Accordingly, it is dismissed. 7. It is so ordered. Dated, Signed and Delivered at Kitui this 13th day of June, 2019. L. N. MUTENDE JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.