Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Wjm Alias Ms v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITUI CRIMINAL CASE NO. 37 OF 2018 WJM ALIAS MS.................................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.....................................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. WJM alias MS, a child in conflict with the law, was arraigned in Court for the offence of Murder. 2. He seeks to be released on bail pending trial on grounds that he has been in police custody since 19th November, 2018; he is a student in [particulars withheld] Secondary School in Kitui Central Sub-County and was to join form two (2) at the beginning of the year; he stays with his parents in [particulars withheld] Village, Kyangwithya West Location in Kitui Central; the area of jurisdiction that he shall not leave as he is not a flight risk. 3. The Application is not opposed, save that the Prosecuting Counsel, Mr. Gesire urged the Court to consider the fact of the victim having been a student at the school that the Applicant attends which would require him not to go back to that school. 4. Bail is a constitutional right unless there are circumstances that require the Applicant’s incarceration. (See Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution). 5. In this case no compelling reasons exist that would call for the Applicant being denied bail. It was the recommendation of the Probation Officer that the Applicant be granted bail on reasonable terms as he does not pose any danger to the community since he has never been associated with any criminal activities. 6. From the foregoing I grant the minor bond of Kshs. 200,000/= with a surety in alike sum. 7. It is so ordered. Dated, Signed and Delivered at Kitui this 25th day of June, 2019. L. N. MUTENDE JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.