REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MURANG’A CRIMINAL CASE NO. 2 OF 2015 REPUBLIC.............................................PROSECUTOR VERSUS MARY WANJIKU KAMANDE....................ACCUSED RULING 1. The accused is charged with murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. 2. The particulars are that on 24 th December 2014 at Nguthuru village, Nguthuru Location within Murang’a County, she murdered Sherlene Wambui Wanjiku. 3. She pleaded not guilty. The prosecution lined up three witnesses. 4. The deceased was a daughter of the accused. The deceased was a disabled and vulnerable child. 5. The prosecution’s case is largely built on circumstantial evidence. For instance, PW2 testified that the accused had previously exposed the child to grave danger by depositing her in the middle of a road. But a vehicle avoided running over the deceased. 6. On the material date, PW1 left the deceased at home with the accused. She was summoned later to the house and found the lifeless body of the deceased on a seat. The accused denied killing the deceased. The post mortem form (exhibit 1) indicates that the cause of death was chest injuries due to assault. 7. Applying the test in Bhatt v Republic [1957] E.A. 332 and R v Kipkering arap Koske & another 16 EACA 135 (1949) I find that the Republic has established a prima facie case. 8. Accordingly, under the provisions of section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, I place the accused on her defence. It is so ordered. DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at MURANG’A this 23rd day of July 2019. KANYI KIMONDO JUDGE Ruling read in open court in the presence ofAccused. Mr. Mutinda for the Republic. Mr. J. N. Mbuthia for the accused. Ms. Dorcas and Ms. Elizabeth, Court Clerks.
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.