REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 43 OF 2006 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ALFRED WANDANDA WANGANYA (DECEASED) RULING 1. What is for determination herein is the summons for revocation of grant dated 20 th July 2018. I have read through the entire record, that is to say the petition, the confirmation proceedings, the summons for revocation and the rival affidavits, and the judgment in ELC No. 195 of 2015. 2. I note that the parties hereto opted for the easy way out, written submissions, yet the issues are convoluted and required to be determined by way of oral evidence. In highly contested matters, such as the present one, disposal should be by way of viva voce evidence. The averments of the parties made in their respective affidavits ought to be subjected to cross-examination for all the contested issues to come out clearly. Parties and counsel owe it to the court to do everything to bring out all the issues, and that best happens when some of these matters are subjected to oral hearing, where the court can seek clarifications from the parties if need be. 3. I accordingly hereby direct that the said summons shall be disposed of by way of oral evidence to be adduced on dates to be given at the delivery of this ruling. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019 W. MUSYOKA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.