REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYAMIRA REVISION NO. 21 of 2019 SALOME KEMUNTO.................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC......................................................................RESPONDENT {Being a Revision against the conviction and sentence of Hon. B. M. Kimtai – PM Keroka in Keroka Principal Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. 680 of 2019} 18th September, 2019 Before Lady Justice E. N. Maina – J Court Keroka PMCR 680 of 2019 has been placed before me for revision. The accused in the said case was arraigned on 2 counts, namely: Count I: Being in possession of alcoholic drinks contrary to Section 27 (1) (b) as read with Section 27 (4) of the Alcoholic Drinks Control Act. Particulars: On 6th August 2019 at Mobaba area in Masaba North Sub-county within Nyamira County was found in possession of 2 litres of chang’aa for sale without a licence. Count II: Being in possession of alcoholic drinks contrary to Section 27 (1) (b) as read with Section 27 (4) of the Alcoholic Drinks Control Act. Particulars: On 6th August 2019 at Mobaba area in Masaba North Sub-county within Nyamira County was found in possession of 60 litres of Busaa for sale without a licence. The accused pleaded guilty on both counts and when the facts were read to her she confirmed they were correct. The trial Magistrate then convicted and sentenced her to a fine of Kshs. 2,000/= or one (1) month imprisonment on Count I and to a fine of Kshs. 30,000/= or six (6) months imprisonment on Count II. The trial Magistrate has written to this court stating that when he went to destroy the exhibits he found the same were not chang’aa or busaa but plain water. I have considered the application before me carefully and my conclusion is that apart from the facts not disclosing an offence, given that the substance exhibited in court was not what it was, the manner of recording the plea was also defective. The trial Magistrate ought to have confirmed that the substance brought before him was what it was alleged to be before convicting the accused person. Waiting until after the conviction and sentencing was an error. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The conviction is reversed and the sentences are set aside. The accused person shall be set at liberty forthwith and if any fine had been paid the same shall be refunded. E. N. MAINA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.