REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MAKUENI HCCR NO. 18 OF 2018 REPUBLIC...........................................................................PROSECUTION VERSUS NICHOLAS MUU KITENG’E...................................................ACCUSED RULING 1. Pw10 Sergent Paul Kiilu of DCI Makueni scenes of crime section took photos of recovered heads of cattle. As per the certificate before the court, he was appointed as scenes of crime officer vide gazette notice No. 10284 of 6 th December, 2006. Mr. Muli for the accused objected to the production of these photos because the certificate by Sgt Paul Kiilu was not in compliance with Section 78, 79 and 106 of the Evidence Act on admissibility of electronic evidence. 2. Mrs. Owenga for the prosecution opposed the objection saying those were issues to be tackled in cross examination since the witness was present in court. 3. I have considered both submissions. The photographs before this court have not been shown to be computer generated to be governed by Section 106 of the Evidence Act. They fall under Section 78 Evidence Act. The witness is the person who took the photos and has done a certificate to that effect. There is no requirement that the certificate must be dated the date of taking the photos. 4. The defence will have an opportunity to cross examine the witness on the issues he is raising about the certificate. He may also submit on issues of law on the subject at an appropriate time. 5. My finding is that the objection is not merited and the photos and certificate shall be produced as exhibits. DELIVERED, SIGNED & DATED THIS 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2019, IN OPEN COURT AT MAKUENI. ………………………………. H. I. ONG’UDI JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.