REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CRIMINAL CASE NO. 83 OF 2015 REPUBLIC.........................................PROSECUTOR VERSUS BONFACE KIOGORA....................... 1ST ACCUSED JAMLICK KABURU MUGUNA.......2ND ACCUSED BENARD MURIUKI MBAYA........... 3RD ACCUSED RULING 1. Benard Muriuki Mbaya (“the 3rd accused”) faces the charge of murder contrary to sections 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code, Cap 63 Laws of Kenya. He was admitted to bond together with the other 2 accused on 11 th May, 2016. He was released on a bond of Kshs.250,000/- with a surety of a similar amount. 2. On 22nd May, 2018 and subsequent mentions, failed to attend court. The court cancelled his bond, issued a warrant for his arrest and summoned the surety. Before the warrant could be executed, the surety produced the accused in court on 8 th October, 2018. On that date the court declined to pardon him for his absence and placed him in custody. 3. On 25th February, 2019, Mr. Mutegi, Learned Counsel for the 3 rd accused made a formal application for the re-instatement of his bond. The application was supported by the affidavit of the 3 rd accused. He explained the reason for his non-attendance and promised that he has learnt his lesson for the 4 months he has been in custody. 4. At the hearing of the application, Mr. Mutegi relied on the averments in the supporting affidavit and urged that the 3 rd accused should be given another chance. Mr. Gitonga, Learned prosecutor opposed the application. He insisted that the 3 rd accused is flight risk. 5. I have considered the averments in the supporting affidavit and the submissions of learned Counsel. Bond is usually a constitutional right which an accused is entitled to but on terms. Once an accused breaches any of the terms thereof, he loses that right. 6. In the present case, the 3 rd accused breached one of the terms of his bond. I have however taken into consideration that, his father who is his surety not only produced him in court when called upon, but he also attended court on 26 th February, 2019 at the hearing of the application and confirmed to court that he was still willing to stand surety for the 3 rd accused. 7. Having considered the positions of the parties before me and the position taken by the surety, I will allow the application and re-instate the bond. The 3rd accused is warned that next time he fails to appear, the court will deal with him without mercy. Orders accordingly. DATED and DELIVERED at Meru this 24th day of October, 2019. A. MABEYA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.