REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 32 OF 2019 (CORAM: R.E. ABURILI – J.) DAVID ONYANGO ALUOCH............................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC......................................................RESPONDENT (Being an Appeal against sentence and conviction in PMCRC ( S.O.) No. 384 of 2019 dated 3.9.2019 Before Hon. E. Wasike – S.R.M.) COURT RULING 1. I have considered the application for sentence revision. I have also considered the circumstances under which the offence was committed, and the sentence review report filed on 22.7. 2019 by the Siaya Probation Officer, Mr. John Oyieko. 2. The Applicant was sentenced to serve 7 months imprisonment for the offence of assault causing actual bodily harm. 3. He is now remorseful and promises not to repeat the offence. He is married with four children who depend on him for a livelihood. He is a boda boda rider. 4. Having considered the plea by the Applicant/Convict who is seeking a short sentence in prison, I exercise discretion and revise the prison term imposed on the Applicant which is lawful and not excessive but that the Applicant can benefit the community by serving Community Service. 5. I order the Applicant/Convict David Onyango to serve Community Service at Bondo Law Courts for a period of three months from the date of his release from prison. He shall be directly supervised by the Executive Officer, Bondo Law Courts who shall ensure that the Applicant reports to perform unpaid work at the Bondo Law Courts and signs in the attendance register to be verified by the Senior Resident Magistrate. 6. Orders Accordingly. Signed and Delivered at Siaya This 16th Day of SEPTEMBER, 2019. R.E. ABURILI JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.