Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Arif Ahmedali Sitafalwala & 1 other v Africare Limited (medanta)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI COMMERCIAL & ADMIRALTY DIVISION MISC. 40 OF 2018 ARIF AHMEDALI SITAFALWALA.....................................APPLICANT VS. AFRICARE LIMITED (MEDANTA)................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. An issue has arisen that may not have been raised by the Applicant when he filed the Notice of Motion of 19 th June 2018. 2. In the course of responding to the application for setting aside, it has turned out that one Victor Thairu who is a legal officer with the Respondent at one time worked as an associate in the firm of Kariuki Muigai and Company which is the current employer of Mr. Timothy Njenga, the Arbitrator herein. The Respondents now take up the issue of conflict of interest and fault the Arbitrator for failing to make a disclosure of that possible conflict. 3. Given the binding and final nature of Arbitral Awards the Court takes the view that this matter is important enough as to warrant full interrogation. 4. For this reason I direct that the application herein, all replies and submissions be served on the Arbitrator to enable him make an answer to the issue raised. The Arbitrator shall file his reply within 30 days of service. Dated, delivered and signed in open Court at Nairobi this 27th day of September 2019. F. TUIYOTT JUDGE PRESENT:Mugesca for Applicant Malulu for Onsare for Respondent Court assistant: Nixon

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.