REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. 6 OF 2019 (CORAM: HON. R.E. ABURILI - J) JULIUS SHIKUKU MURONO......PETITIONER VERSUS REPUBLIC ...................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. This petition seeks for resentencing of the petitioner following his conviction for murder in Siaya High Court Criminal Case No 31 of 2015 Republic Versus Julius Shikuku Murono and Bernard Okutoyi Murono, on the ground that the petitioner was sentenced to death for the offence of murder by this court (Hon J.A. Makau J.) on 30 th January 2017, which sentence, according to the petitioner, was unconstitutional as espoused in the Francis Karioko Muruatetu v Republic SC Pet 15 &16 of 2015. 2. The petitioner and his brother co accused/convict Bernard Okutoyi Murono appealed to the Court of Appeal vide CA CR A No. 31 of 2017 and have been claiming that they withdrew the Appeal but there is no evidence of such withdrawal. The trial Court record has never been resubmitted to this court despite several reminders to the Registrar of the Court of Appeal 3. That notwithstanding, as the impugned judgment was rendered by this Court by (Hon. Makau J), this court has no jurisdiction to review the sentence imposed on the Petitioners as that would amount to sitting on its own appeal. 4. Accordingly, this petition is struck out for want of jurisdiction, and as there is no evidence from the Court of Appeal rejecting the petitioner’s appeal. 5. This file is closed 6. Orders accordingly. Dated, signed and delivered this 6th Day of November 2019. R.E. ABURILI JUDGE In the presence of: Petitioner in person Mr Okachi Senior Principal Prosecution Counsel for the State CA: Winnie and Modestar
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.