Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Japheth Muita Githaiga v Presbyterian University of East Africa

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI CAUSE NO. 126 OF 2015 JAPHETH MUITA GITHAIGA................................................CLAIMANT VERSUS PRESBYTERIAN UNIVERSITY OF EAST AFRICA...................................................................................RESPONDENT JUDGMENT 1. Japheth Muita Githaiga (Claimant) served the Presbyterian University of East Africa (Respondent) from 8 November 2010 to 30 September 2013 when he resigned. The Claimant was holding the position of Registrar at the time of separation. 2. Upon the resignation, the Respondent wrote to the Claimant on 22 September 2014 to advise him that his gratuity was Kshs 1,285,200/-. 3. Despite computing the gratuity, the Respondent did not pay the Claimant the gratuity save for Kshs 200,000/-, forcing the Claimant to institute these legal proceedings for the balances of the gratuity. 4. In its Response, the Respondent denied the authenticity of the computations and contended that the gratuity due to the Claimant was lower than the Kshs 1,285,200/- (but did not disclose such amount). 5. When the Cause was called out for hearing on 8 October 2019, the Respondent indicated that the parties were negotiating, nevertheless, the Court directed the hearing to proceed after the cause list call over. 6. For unexplained reasons, the Respondent and its advocate were not in Court at 1150am when the Cause was reached. 7. The Claimant testified and filed submissions on 24 October 2019. The Court has considered the pleadings, evidence on record and the submissions. 8. The Claimant’s testimony was not interrogated at all. 9. The Court has no reason at all to doubt the authenticity of the letter dated 22 September 2014 signed by the Respondent’s then ViceChancellor setting out the gratuity due to the Claimant and/or the Claimant’s testimony that he was only paid Kshs 200,000/- of the gratuity. Conclusion and Orders 10. The Court finds and holds that the Respondent owes the Claimant Kshs 1,085,200/- on account of gratuity. 11. The Court enters judgment for the Claimant in the sum of Kshs 1,085,200/- together with interest at court rates from 3 February 2015. 12. The Claimant to have costs. Delivered, dated and signed in Nairobi on this 1st day of November 2019. Radido Stephen Judge

page 1 of 2

Appearances For Claimant Ms. Ingati instructed by Eshiwani Ashubwe & Co. Advocates For Respondent P.M. Kamaara & Associates Advocates (disappeared from Court before the hearing) Court Assistant Lindsey

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.