REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2018 OWALA CHAMPINGNY MAKONYANGO........................................APPELLANT VERSUS SIAYA WHOLESALERS LTD.........................................................RESPONDENT (From Original Siaya PMCC 68 of 2011 Ruling Delivered on the 14.12.2017 by Hon J. O. Ongondo – Principal Magistrate) RULING 1. On 15.7.2019 this court in sustaining this appeal which was to be dismissed for want of a complete record of appeal directed the appellant to file and serve a complete record of appeal upon the Respondent within 15 days from the date of the Ruling, and fixed the date for directions on 17.9.2019. On the latter date, the Appellant‘s Counsel was not present and the Respondent’s Counsel again sought for dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the Orders of 15.7.2019. 2. The court declined to dismiss the appeal and fixed this date for hearing and directed the Respondent‘s Counsel to serve the Appellant’s counsel. The latter are represented today for hearing and again there is no evidence of compliance with the Orders of 15.7.2019. 3. That being the case, I have no option but to proceed and dismiss the appeal herein for non-compliance with orders on 15.7.2019 as there is no complete record of appeal upon which the appeal can be determined as stipulated in Order 42 of the Civil Procedure Rules. 4. The appellant shall pay costs of the appeal and of the application dated 20.5.2019, to the Respondent. Dated, Signed and Delivered at Siaya this 20th day of November, 2019. R.E. ABURILI JUDGE In the presence of: Mr. Ochanyo h/b for Mr. Ashioya Adv. for the Appellant Miss Ndeda h/b for Mr. Ayosee for the Respondent CA: Brenda and Modestar
Original judgment
Owala Champingny Makonyango v Siaya Wholesalers Ltd
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.