REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAROK CRIMINAL CASE NO. 30 OF 2017 REPUBLIC......................................PROSECUTOR VERSUS FREDERICK KIPKIRUI KORIR.........ACCUSED RULING 1. The issue before me is whether or not a prima facie case has been made out against the accused, so as to require him to be put on his defence in terms of section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 75) Laws of Kenya. 2. The accused in charged with the murder of Charles Rotich, which is an offence under section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code (Cap 63) Laws of Kenya. 3. At the close of the prosecution case, counsel for the accused, Messrs Ochego-Onduso made a submission of no case to answer, which was supported with authorities including but not limited to Ramanlal Trambakal Bhatt v R [1957] EA 332, in which the court held that a prima facie case is made out if a tribunal properly directing its mind on the law and the evidence could convict, if no explanation is offered by the defence. Counsel further submitted that the evidence of the prosecution witnesses was not corroborated, which counsel pointed out was circumstantial in nature. 4. The prosecution in response submitted that a prima facie had been made out against the accused to warrant the him being put on his defence. They cited Ramanlal Trambakal Bhatt v R, supra, amongst other authorities. They furthermore, submitted that two prosecution witnesses namely Robert Kipyegon (Pw 1) and Robert Kipyegon Mutai (PW 3) gave direct eyewitness evidence, which implicates the accused. 5. I have considered the totality of the evidence in the light of the applicable law. As a result, I find that the accused has a case to answer. 6. He is therefore put on his defence in terms of section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 75) Laws of Kenya. Ruling signed, dated and delivered at Narok in open court this 3 rd day of December, 2019 in the presence of Mr. Omwega for the Republic and Mr. Onduso for the accused. J. M. Bwonwong’a Judge 3/12/2019
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.