Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Lucy Anyango Budhos v Stephen Eugene Maloba Vincent Mutanda

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUSIA PROBATE & ADMINSTRATION NO. 40 OF 2013 IN THE ESTATE OF: JOHN JOSEPH MUTANDA ODEBERO...............DECEASED BETWEEN LUCY ANYANGO BUDHOS................................................APPLICANT/OBJECTOR AND STEPHEN EUGENE MALOBA VINCENT MUTANDA............................................................................RESPONDENTS RULING 1. Lucy Anyango Budhos, the applicant/ objector herein filed an application dated 15 th March 2017 for revocation and annulment of the grant issued herein under section 76 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 44(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules. It is premised on the following grounds: a) That the grant was obtained fraudulently by making a false statement or by concealment of material facts. b) That the grant was obtained by means of untrue allegation of a fact essential in point of law to justify the grant notwithstanding that the allegation made in ignorance or inadvertently. 2. The respondents did not file a response. 3. I have perused the affidavit of the applicant. The following facts have emerged: a) That the respondents herein are the grandchildren of John Joseph Mutanda Odebero, the deceased herein. b) That the deceased herein was survived by his children. c) That the petitioners/respondents had omitted some beneficiaries from the list they filed in court. 4. Section 76 of the Law of succession provides inter alia as follows: A grant of representation, whether or not confirmed, may at any time be revoked or annulled if the court decides, either on application by any interested party or of its own motion— (a) that the proceedings to obtain the grant were defective in substance; (b) that the grant was obtained fraudulently by the making of a false statement or by the concealment from the court of something material to the case; (c) that the grant was obtained by means of an untrue allegation of a fact essential in point of law to justify the grant notwithstanding that the allegation was made in ignorance or inadvertently; 5. Rule 44 (1) of Probate and Administration Rules provides for the form of the application.

page 1 of 2

6. I therefore find that the respondents concealed some material facts from the court and did not rank high in priority to file the succession cause in respect of the estate of John Joseph Mutanda Odebero, the deceased herein. The application is merited. The grant to the respondents is annulled and the objector is hereby issued with a grant. She should move the court to consolidate this matter with Busia High Court Succession Cause No. 127 of 1995. 7. The costs of this application to the applicant. DELIVERED and SIGNED at BUSIA this 20th day of November, 2019. KIARIE WAWERU KIARIE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.