REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI COMMERCIAL AND ADMIRALTY DIVISION CIVIL SUIT NO. 627 OF 2012 ANTHONY RAYMOND CORDEIRO...................1ST PLAINTIFF ELAINE DESA CORDIERO..................................2ND PLAINTIFF TECHNOLOGY TODAY LTD...............................3RD PLAINTIFF -VERSUS ADRIAN NOEL CARVALHO............................1ST DEFENDANT ARLET DOMINICA CAEVALHO...................2ND DEFENDANT I&M BANK LIMITED.......................................3RD DEFENDANT JAYANTLAL JIVAJ MEPAL SHAH................4TH DEFENDANT MANSUKHLAL JIVAJ MEPAL SHAH...........5TH DEFENDANT DILIPKUMAR JIVAJ MEPAL SHAH.............6TH DEFENDANT RULING ISSUES TO BE DETERMINED BY THE TRIAL COURT AS DRAWN UP BY THE COURT The parties to these proceedings have been unable to agree on the issues which arise from the pleadings. Therefore, before the trial can commence, and in order to enable the parties appreciate the scope of matters about which they need to lead evidence, it has become necessary for the Court to settle the List of Issues. Here below are the said Issues: 1. Did the 1st and 2nd defendants fraudulently procure themselves to be registered as the holders of 1750 and 23, 249 shares, respectively, in the 3rd plaintiff? 2. Did the registration of the 1st and 2nd defendants as the majority shareholders in the 3rd plaintiff, impose fiduciary duties upon them? 3. Was the sale and transfer of LR NO. 1870/vi/145, by the 1st and 2nd defendants, to the 4th, 5th and 6th defendants void, for the lack of legal capacity on the part of the said 1st and 2nd defendants? 4. Should the 4th, 5th and 6th defendants be compelled to deliver up to the Registrar of Titles, the Transfer and Certificate of Title in L.R NO. 1870/vi/145, for cancellation of the transfer which was in favour of those defendants? 5. Are the 4th, 5th and 6th defendants liable to pay mesne profits to the 3rd plaintiff, with effect from 19th October 2011?
page 1 of 2
6. Are the 4th, 5th and 6th defendants liable to compensate the 3 rd plaintiff by way of General Damages? If so, what is the quantum of the said damages? 7. If mesne profits or damages are awarded, should they attract interest? If so, at what rates and from what dates? 8. Did the 3rd defendant knowingly, (or at all), take part in the alleged unlawful sale of L.R NO. 1870/vi/145? If so, is the 3rd defendant liable to compensate the plaintiffs or any of them? 9. Who should pay the costs of the suit, and to whom? DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI, this 4th day of June 2018. FRED A. OCHIENG’ JUDGE
page 2 of 2