Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ssebyala Sulaiman & 1 other v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL DIVISION CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 811 OF 2018 SSEBYALA SULAIMAN…………….……..……………APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC …………………….…………………....…RESPONDENT RULING The Applicant was charged at Makadara Law Courts in Criminal Case No. 319 of 2018 with the offence of being in possession of forged bank notes or currency contrary to Section 367(e) of the Penal Code. The offence was committed on 9th February, 2018 at Eastleigh. The Applicant had with him 7 pieces of 50 US Dollars denominations which he knew were fake currency. He was presented to court on 12/2/2018 when he pleaded not guilty. On 9/8/2018 he changed his plea and was convicted on his own plea of guilty. He was sentenced to serve one and a half years imprisonment. He pleads for leniency stating that he was duped. He further pleads that the State helps him to return to his mother country as he has no means of travelling back to his country. On the part of this court, I consider that the Applicant was a first offender. He also pleaded guilty, although later, thus saving precious Judicial time. The amount of money in his possession was also not too large. These are factors I consider, mitigate for leniency. Cumulatively, he has been in remand for about nine months which I consider is sufficient sentence in the circumstances. I accordingly set aside the remainder of the jail term. I substitute it with an order that the Applicant be forthwith set free unless otherwise lawfully held. He shall be released to the Immigration Department so that the State can repatriate him to his mother country, Uganda. DATED and DELIVERED this 20th day of November, 2018 G.W. NGENYE-MACHARIA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.