Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v 1. The Permanent Secretary Ministry of State For Provincial Administration and Internal Security & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA MOMBASA MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 60 OF 2012 (JR) REPUBLIC.............................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS 1. THE PERMANENT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF STATE FOR PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATION AND INTERNAL SECURITY.....1ST RESPONDENT 2. THE HONOURABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL......2ND RESPONDENT EX-PARTE W A O (Minor Suing Through His Father J A O)......................EX-PARTE APPLICANT JUDGMENT 1. The Ex-parte Applicant seeks an order of Mandamus to compel the 1st Respondent to pay the sum of Ksh. 830,567 pursuant to a decree of the court in the Principal Magistrate’s Court Civil Suit No. 80 of 1998 a personal injury suit against the 1st Respondent. 2. A decree of the court dated 17/11/2011 together with a certificate of order against the Government dated 17/11/2011 duly received at the office of the Attorney General on 26/4/2012 together with demand letter by counsel for the applicant are attached in support of the Application. 3. No appeal was preferred against the judgment of the trial court in the personal injury suit aforesaid. 4. The Respondents did not file any Replying Affidavit and counsel for the Respondents indicated that he had not obtained instructions from the 1st respondent despite rejected services. 5. An order of Mandamus is available to compel the performance of statutory duty. Upon the judgment and decree of the said court in Voi RMCCC No. 80 of 1998, the 1st Respondent was under a duty to satisfy the decree upon the compliance with the provisions of section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act with regard to execution of decrees against the Government. 6. The court has noted that the ex-parte applicant has duly complied with the procedure under section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act by extracting the decree and taking out a certificate of order against

page 1 of 2

the Government both dated 17/11/2011. The 1st Respondent has no lawful excuse for failure to pay. Orders 7. Accordingly, the Court grants an order of Mandamus as prayed by the ex-parte Applicant to compel the 1st respondent to satisfy the decree of the court made in Voi RMCCC No. 80 of 1998 W A O (Minor suing through his father J A O) v. Attorney General on 17/11/2011. 8. The costs of this application and the application for leave to file Judicial Review Proceedings shall be paid by the 1st Respondent to the Ex-parte applicant. …………………………………………… EDWARD M. MURIITHI JUDGE DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 2018. E. K OGOLA JUDGE Appearances: M/S Stephen Oddiaga & Co. Advocates for Applicant Ms. Namahia, State Counsel for Respondents

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.