REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU ELC NO. 10 OF 2007 JOSEPH MUTURA MUGAMBI........................PLAINTIFF VERSUS RUTERE MWIRIA & 2 OTHERS................DEFENDANT RULING 1. Defendant applicant has filed an application dated 31.10.2017 and filed on 1.11.2017), whereby he is seeking to have a review of the orders given earlier on a compliance. 2. The gist of this application is that defence side desires to be given an opportunity to comply with order 11 of the civil procedure rules. 3. The application is opposed. Parties have filed their submissions in respect of the said application. 4. I find that the issues raised by the applicant defendant were adequately covered in my ruling of 27.9.2017. 5. As rightly submitted by the plaintiff/respondent, applicant has not demonstrated that there is discovery of new and important facts which should warrant a review of the court’s orders. 6. In the circumstances I find that the application has no merits. The same is dismissed with costs to plaintiff. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS DAY OF 11th APRIL, 2018 IN THE PRESENCE OF:Court Assistant: Janet/Galgalo Miss Munga holding brief for Mutunga for defendant/applicant – present Kithinji holding brief for Murango Mwenda for plaintiff - present HON. LUCY. N. MBUGUA ELC JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.