REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII CIVIL APPEAL NO. 208 OF 2009 CONSOLIDATED WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 215 OF 2009 BETWEEN KIPKEBE TEA COMPANY LIMITED..........APPELLANT AND PAUL NYAKUNDI NYAMUGA .........1ST RESPONDENT KEBIRIGO GENERAL STORES......2ND RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Judgment and Decree of Hon. S. Wewa RM dated and delivered on 29 th September 2009 by Hon. Kimutai SRM in Kisii CMCC No. 565 of 2000) RULING It is not in dispute from the record that no step has been taken by the appellant since 11 th December 2015 when the Judge directed the parties to take steps to prosecute the matter until the application to dismiss the appeal was filed on 12 th April 2018. The appellant contends that the reason for failing to take steps is because of the transfer of Judges which has prevented appeals from progressing, that it has been difficult to get a date from the registry hence difficult to fix the matter and that it was the duty of both advocates to fix the matter for hearing. The court in dismissing an appeal is called upon to exercise its discretion on the basis that the reasons for failure to prosecute the appeal have been explained. I note that this is a 2009 appeal and I do not find the reasons advanced reasonable as nothing has been shown that would have prevented the appellant from prosecuting the appeal. No letter was addressed to the Registry for the period of three (3) years expressing difficulty in prosecuting the appeal. The appeal belongs to the appellant and a respondent who is wary of waiting for an appellant to prosecute its appeal is entitled to apply for its dismissal. This appeal is now dismissed for want of prosecution with costs of Ksh. 15,000/=. D.S MAJANJA , J 19/6/2018 Court: Judgment read and delivered in open court. D.S MAJANJA, J 19/6/2018
Original judgment
Kipkebe Tea Company Limited v Paul Nyakundi Nyamuga & 1 other
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.