REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU MISC. SUCC. APPLICATION NO. 73 OF 2007 PHILIPINUS NJIRU KUURA ............................ OBJECTOR VERSUS ZAKARIA NYAGA M’MUNGORI....................PETITIONER RULING 1. By his Summons for Rectification dated 30 th May, 2018, the applicant has applied for the correction of typing errors in the Judgment dated 12th November, 2014 and consequent thereto for the reissuance of the grant to him. The application is brought under Rules 49 and 73 of the Probate and Administrative Rules Cap 160 of the Laws of Kenya. 2. The errors were said to be in pages 1, 6, 12 14 and 15. These are that; the title to the Judgment should have been In the Estate of M’Kuura M’Munyori instead of Im the Estate of M’Kuuru M’Munyori; that Kuura M’Munyori bought land from her late husband instead of form his husband; that the name of property L.R. No. Muthmabi/Upper Karimba/767 should have read as L.R Muthambi/Upper Karimba/761; that the date of the confirmed grant should have been 28 th July, 2004 and not 28 th June, 2004 and that the judgment should have shown that I was signed dated and delivered on 12 th November, 2014 and not 12th October, 2010. 3. Mr. Mokua for the respondent indicated that they were not opposed to the application. Mr. Nyamu for the applicant therefore urged the court to allow the application as prayed. 4. I have considered the application and the entire record. I am satisfied that the errors pointed out are true and that the judgment should have read as prayed by the applicant. In the circumstances, I allow the application as prayed in the application. Let the judgment be retyped and with the corrections suggested by the applicant. Orders accordingly. DATED and DELIVERED att Meru this 28th day of June, 2018. A. MABEYA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.