Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

James Musembi Vaita v Automotive & Industrial Battery Manufacturers Limited

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2005 JAMES MUSEMBI VAITA................................................. APPELLANT VERSUS AUTOMOTIVE & INDUSTRIAL BATTERY MANUFACTURERS LIMITED.....................................RESPONDENT RULING The Appeal herein was filed on the 24 th February 2005 being an Appeal against the judgment and Decree of the Chief Magistrate Court at Nairobi, in CMCC No. 4432 of 2003. After filing the appeal the Appellant went to sleep and on 11 th may 2018, the court listed the same for notice to show cause why it should not be dismissed for want of prosecution, under the provisions of Order 42 Rule 35(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules. On the said date, Mr. Nyabene holding brief for Mr. Wambugu informed the court that there are two applications pending hearing both of which were filed by the Respondents. He did not tell the court whether the Appellant is still interested in pursuing the Appeal and what steps he has taken since the Appeal was filed. This is notwithstanding the fact that the matter had been listed for Notice to show case. The court has perused the record and it is noted that since the Appeal was filed, no action has been taken by the Appellant to prosecute the same. Infact, save for the Memorandum of appeal filed on 24 th February, 2005 nothing else has been done in this matter. The two applications that are said to be pending are not on record and it is doubtful if indeed there are any such applications. Even assuming, there are pending applications, the Appellant is at liberty to fix them for hearing and/or apply to have them dismissed to pave way for the hearing of the Appeal. It is further noted that the Lower Court file was forwarded to this court and upon perusal of the same, it shows that proceedings were typed and a copy of the decree issued on 23 rd February, 2009 yet the Appellant herein has not even filed a record of Appeal. This is a clear indication that the Appellant has lost interest in the Appeal. In the end, I find that no good cause was shown why the Appeal should not be dismissed and I therefore order that the same be and is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. Dated, Signed and Delivered at Nairobi this 14th Day of June 2018. ……………………………. L. NJUGUNA JUDGE In the Presence of …………………………. For the Applicant …………………………. For the Respondent

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.