Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Isaac Mwiti Kirema & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CRIMINAL CASE NO. 88 OF 2014 REPUBLIC.................................................PROSECUTION VS ISAAC MWITI KIREMA............................1STACCUSED JAPHET MURITHI M’IGWETA..............2ND ACCUSED RULING The accused Isaac Mwiti and Japhet Murithi M’Igweta are both charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the penal code. Particulars are that on 26 th day of September 2014 at Nchoroiboro village, Ruiri location, Buuri division within Meru County the accused persons Isaac Mwiti Kirema and Japhet Muirethi M’Igweta jointly with others not before the court murdered Elijah Kirimi. PW1 who also sustained injuries during assault on the deceased witnessed the deceased being murdered. Pw3 the daughter in law of the deceased also testified to have witnessed the incident. PW1 and PW3 say it happened in broad daylight. PW2 Dr. Simon Mwangi produced post-mortem Report confirming the death and cause of death of the deceased. From evidence of the 5 prosecution witnesses, this court is of the view that a prima facie case has been established sufficient to place accused persons on defence. They have a case to answer. HON. A.ONG’INJO JUDGE RULING SIGNED, DELIVERED AND DATED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 . IN THE PRESENCE OF: C/A:-Penina Prosecution: - Mr Kiarie for state Mr Omari Advocate for Accused A1 A2 Present in person Mr Omari Advocate The accused person will give sworn statements and will call witnesses. I will confirm the number of witnesses.

page 1 of 2

Order Defence Hearing 4.9.18 HON. A.ONG’INJO JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.