Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Jacob Mururu M’kiambati v Isaiah Kinyua Luulu & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 510 OF 2004 IN THE MATTER OF ESTATE OF KIAMBATI MATAGU - (DECEASED) JACOB MURURU M’KIAMBATI..........................................PETITIONER VS ISAIAH KINYUA LUULU.............................................1ST RESPONDENT JEDIEL LUULU.............................................................2 ND RESPONDENT RULING The deceased Kiambati Matagu died on 28th October 1969 and was survived by:1. Zipporah Ciomarimba – wife 2. Francis Gichunge – Son 3. Lesany Mioki – Son 4. Julius Mbaabu – Son 5. Joseph Muruingi – Son 6. Stephen Meeme – Son 7. Japhet Luulu – son – deceased. 8. Jacob Mururu – son 9. Geoffrey Kanyana His intestate net estate is made up of L.R. Njia/Luburio/101. Grant of Letters of Administration was made on 19 th April 2005 to Jacob Mururu M’Kiambati. Distribution of the estate was done on 13.11.2006 as follows:Julius Mbaabu – 1 acre Stephen Meeme – ½ acre Joseph Murungi – 1 acre Jacob Mururu – 2 ½ acres Geoffrey Kanyano – 1 ½ acres

page 1 of 2

Isaiah Muriungi/Maria – 0.10 acre Jacob Mururu M’Kiambati – Balance Certificate was issued on 14th February 2007. On 18.5.2007 the grant was revoked as distribution left out Japhet Luulu who was shown in the chief’s letter dated 27 th April 2004 as son to the deceased. That the estate of the said Japhet Luulu was not provided for. In consideration of the order made on 18 th May 2007 and in consideration of the protest to confirmation and distribution herein by Isaiah Kinyua Luulu and in consideration of the submissions for and against protest, I have seen that the mode of distribution in affidavit of Jacob Mururu M’Kiambati which now the share included for the interested parties fathers share from L.R. No. Njia/Luburu/101 is fair and equitable because the other averments in the affidavit have not been challenged. This mode of distribution was signed by the majority of beneficiaries and clan elders after the initial grant was revoked. If L.R. 101 was to be distributed equal to the beneficiaries listed in the chief’s letter the share for the late Japhet Luulu would reduce significantly and may not be of any economic benefit to his children and wife. This court therefore orders that the one acre share belonging to the late Japhet Luulu son to the deceased herein shall be held by Isaiah Kinyua Luulu in trust for his siblings in equal shares upon the beneficiaries petitioning for Letters of Administration. No orders as to costs. HON. A.ONG’INJO JUDGE RULING SIGNED, DELIVERED AND DATED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY 2018 IN THE PRESENCE OF: C/A:- Penina Petitioner: - Mr Ojiambo Advocate holding brief for Rimita Advocate for Petitioner. Respondent :- Ms Okello holding brief for Mutegi for Interested Party. HON. A.ONG’INJO JUDGE Ms Okello We pray for a copy of the said judgement. Order Interested Party/Protesters counsel to be supplied with copy of judgement of copying charges. HON. A.ONG’INJO JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.