REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII CRIMINAL CASE NO. 10 OF 2018 REPUBLIC................................PROSECUTOR VERSUS JAFARI OMARI NYAKUNDI........ACCUSED RULING ON SENTENCE 1. The accused, JAFARI OMARI NYAKUNDI, has pleaded guilty to the offence of Manslaughter contrary to Section 202 as read with Section 205 of the Penal Code (Chapter 63 of the Laws of Kenya) following a plea bargain agreement. The accused accepted that he unlawfully caused the death of EVANS THOMAS ONYINKWA on 15 th March 2018 at Kenyenya Shopping Centre within Kisii County. The accused and deceased were relatives. 2. The facts outlined were that on the material evening the deceased was drinking at Masaba Bar at Kenyenya when the accused came and demanded to be given alcohol. When the deceased refused, a scuffle ensued between the two of them. They were separated and the accused left and came back after a while stabbed the deceased once in the chest. He left the bar and surrendered to the police. The deceased died as a result of the stab wound to his chest which penetrated the blood vessels of the heart. 3. The deceased’s family has called for a stiff sentence given that their loved one died an unjustified death. 4. I have considered that the accused is young and has expressed remorse and that the offence took place in a bar following a fight where he was drunk. On the other hand, I also accept that the death of a person must be recognized. 5. Taking all factors into account, including his plea of guilty at the first instance and plea of leniency, I hereby sentence the accused JAFARI OMARI NYAKUNDI to ten (10) years imprisonment. Sentence read and pronounced in open Court this 23rd July 2018. D.S Majanja Judge Mr. Otieno, Senior Prosecution Counsel, instructed by Office of Director of Prosecutions Mr. Bigogo, Advocate for the Accused
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.