REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 320 OF 2018 REPUBLIC..........................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS COLLINS KIPLAGAT KOECH...................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. This matter was placed before me for revision under Sec. 364 and 365 of the CPC. The basis of which is to confirm the correctness and propriety of the trial magistrate finding especially conviction and sentence where the convicted individual was sentenced to serve a term of 20 years imprisonment for the offence of defilement. By a letter dated 8 th June 2018, J. K. Kiplagat Advocate has on behalf of the convict urged this court to find that the convict was not given a chance to seek legal representation and put in his defence (I am not sure exactly what that implies). 2. The accused (now convict) pleaded guilty to the offence, and from the trial court’s records show that the charge was read over to the accused in Kiswahili – there is no suggestion even in this application for revision that he did not understand Kiswahili. His response was an admission. 3. The facts were then narrated to him and he confirmed them as being correct – at no stage did he indicate that he wished to have legal representation or that some undisclosed source had advised him to plead guilty. 4. Art. 50 (2) (g) provides that; “Every accused person has the right to a fair trial which includes the right to choose and be represented by an advocate, and be informed of that right promptly. 5. Whereas the applicant raises serious and fundamental Constitutional issues, I do not think this can be addressed by way or revision which under Section 363(1) requires the court to satisfy itself as to the legality correctness, propriety of any sentence, or order reviewed or passed. In my view this is an issue that requires great input by the applicant as well as the Director of Public Prosecution, and not a sweeping statement made regarding right to be informed of his option to engage counsel. 6. The matter would be best addressed either on appeal or by a Constitutional petition where both parties can exhaustively submit on the same. 7. I decline to order any revision. DELIVERED and DATED this 5th day of July at ELDORET. H. A. OMONDI JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.