Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 4678 of 2018

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA MISC. CR. APPL. NO. 27 OF 2018 (CORAM: R. E. ABURILI - J.) OBADHA JOSEPH OTIENO..........................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC....................................................................RESPONDENT RULING ON APPLICATION I have considered the application under Rule 113 of the Court of Appeal Rules and the affidavit shown by the convict/applicant. I am not satisfied that the application deserves the orders sought. There is no sufficient cause for the delay in filing of the Appeal and more so, there is material to show that the applicant is a poor person by virtue of his lawful incarceration. Further, no single question of law is framed for consideration by the Court of Appeal in this intended second Appeal. The application is dismissed. The convict to serve lawful sentence meted out. Dated, Signed and Delivered at SIAYA this 31ST day of July 2018. R.E. ABURILI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.