REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA MISC. CR. APPL. NO. 50 OF 2018 (CORAM: R. E. ABURILI - J.) WILLIAM AMONDI ODIGA...............APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC..........................................RESPONDENT RULING ON APPLICATION UNDER RULE 113 OF THE COURT OF APPEAL RULES I have considered the application for leave to appeal out of time as a poor man in this intended second appeal. I find no sufficient cause for the delay and no material has been placed before the Court to show that the Convict is poor. In addition, this being an intended second appeal, there is no demonstration of a single question of law for determination by the Court of Appeal. In this premises, I dismiss the application. The Applicant/Convict to serve his sentence as upheld by the High Court on Appeal in HCCRA 152/2016. Dated, Signed and Delivered at SIAYA this 31st day of July 2018. R.E. ABURILI JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.