Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Samuel Bundi Thuranira v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NANYUKI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 109 OF 2017 SAMUEL BUNDI THURANIRA......APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC......................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from original Sentence dated 17/11/2014 in Nanyuki CM Criminal Case No 1221 of 2012 – E Ngigi, SRM) JUDGMENT 1. The Appellant in this appeal, SAMUEL BUNDI THURANIRA, was convicted after trial of attempted defilement of a child contrary to section 9(1) & (2) of the Sexual Offences Act, No 3 of 2006. It was alleged in the particulars of the offence that on 11 th November, 2012 at in Meru County, he intentionally and unlawfully attempted to cause his penis to penetrate the vagina of one M K, a child aged 17 years. On 17th November, 2014 he was sentenced to serve twelve (12) years imprisonment. He appealed only against the sentence. 2. The law provided for a minimum term of imprisonment of ten (10) years for the offence. Although the Appellant was a first offender, there was violence involved in the commission of the offence. The Appellant bit the complainant’s eye and mouth for which she was treated in hospital. Although the trial court did not say so, the additional two (2) years over and above the minimum must have been on account of the said violence. 3. I find no justification at all to interfere with the sentence imposed upon the Appellant. The sentence was lawful and richly deserved. There is no merit in the appeal against sentence. It is hereby dismissed. It is so ordered. DATED AND SIGNED AT NANYUKI THIS 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2018 H P G WAWERU JUDGE DELIVERED AT NANYUKI THIS 15TH DAY OF AUGUST 2018

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.